Author: Pete R.
Date: 16:29:13 06/29/00
Go up one level in this thread
On June 29, 2000 at 19:13:13, Amir Ban wrote: >So I don't think that suspicion that someone is Rolf Tueschen is in itself a >reason for taking action against a poster. Never said it was. I am convinced personally, but my opinion doesn't count. But I did not mean to imply that the moderators believed he was Rolf. Whether they did or not is immaterial since using real names is now in the rules. FWIW I would gladly provide I.D. if asked even though I was here before this policy was instituted, as would any person who is innocent of being Rolf. ;) Don't be so quick to invite him back with open arms, he probably has a file on you in his desk as well, right next to one on Ed Schroeder, right next to...etc. ;)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.