Author: Matthias Gemuh
Date: 14:10:12 01/11/02
Go up one level in this thread
On January 11, 2002 at 17:03:49, David Rasmussen wrote: >On January 11, 2002 at 16:59:04, Matthias Gemuh wrote: > >> >>Such should not be necessary, except bug somewhere. >>I find this "Mate in 4" at ply 5 (+5 extensions = 10 ply). >>My exts are: >>check: +1 ply >>2 successive checks: +0.6 >>promo: +1 >>good recap: +0.5 >>mate threat: +1 >>single move: +0.75 >>and some more less important ones. > >And you limit your extension at each ply to at most one? Yep! And you apply single >move extension _after_ limiting, like me? No. Why do that? If yes, and you don't see the same >thing, then I might have a bug. If no, then we are not comparable. > >/David
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.