Author: David Rasmussen
Date: 14:03:49 01/11/02
Go up one level in this thread
On January 11, 2002 at 16:59:04, Matthias Gemuh wrote: > >Such should not be necessary, except bug somewhere. >I find this "Mate in 4" at ply 5 (+5 extensions = 10 ply). >My exts are: >check: +1 ply >2 successive checks: +0.6 >promo: +1 >good recap: +0.5 >mate threat: +1 >single move: +0.75 >and some more less important ones. And you limit your extension at each ply to at most one? And you apply single move extension _after_ limiting, like me? If yes, and you don't see the same thing, then I might have a bug. If no, then we are not comparable. /David
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.