Author: Eugene Nalimov
Date: 20:36:19 01/13/02
Go up one level in this thread
Can you please send me the function that was so badly compiled (probably via e-mail)? I'd like to find where VC screwed up. It's too late to fix it for VC7, but probably we can do it for VC7.x. Eugene On January 13, 2002 at 18:51:02, Ed Schröder wrote: >On January 13, 2002 at 16:29:21, Tom Kerrigan wrote: > >>On January 13, 2002 at 07:05:02, Ed Schröder wrote: >> >>>I have to disagree, I have a MSVC6 version of Rebel and it runs 30% slower than >>>the ASM version. >> >>What do you attribute this difference to? Is it simply not possible to write C >>that produces the same assembly as your hand-written code? Or do you take >>certain liberties in the C code (perhaps in the same of readability?) that's >>slowing things down? >> >>-Tom > >Just have a look at the ASM code MSVC6 produces, it often is bad stuff. By >re-writing (optimizing) this "bad ASM stuff" I got my +30%. > >One ambiguous remark, don't believe everthing commercials are telling you :) > >Ed
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.