Author: Ed Schröder
Date: 15:51:02 01/13/02
Go up one level in this thread
On January 13, 2002 at 16:29:21, Tom Kerrigan wrote: >On January 13, 2002 at 07:05:02, Ed Schröder wrote: > >>I have to disagree, I have a MSVC6 version of Rebel and it runs 30% slower than >>the ASM version. > >What do you attribute this difference to? Is it simply not possible to write C >that produces the same assembly as your hand-written code? Or do you take >certain liberties in the C code (perhaps in the same of readability?) that's >slowing things down? > >-Tom Just have a look at the ASM code MSVC6 produces, it often is bad stuff. By re-writing (optimizing) this "bad ASM stuff" I got my +30%. One ambiguous remark, don't believe everthing commercials are telling you :) Ed
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.