Author: Rafael Andrist
Date: 23:21:18 01/13/02
Go up one level in this thread
On January 13, 2002 at 19:27:19, David Rasmussen wrote: >On January 13, 2002 at 18:51:02, Ed Schröder wrote: > >>On January 13, 2002 at 16:29:21, Tom Kerrigan wrote: >> >>>On January 13, 2002 at 07:05:02, Ed Schröder wrote: >>> >>>>I have to disagree, I have a MSVC6 version of Rebel and it runs 30% slower than >>>>the ASM version. >>> >>>What do you attribute this difference to? Is it simply not possible to write C >>>that produces the same assembly as your hand-written code? Or do you take >>>certain liberties in the C code (perhaps in the same of readability?) that's >>>slowing things down? >>> >>>-Tom >> >>Just have a look at the ASM code MSVC6 produces, it often is bad stuff. By >>re-writing (optimizing) this "bad ASM stuff" I got my +30%. >> >>One ambiguous remark, don't believe everthing commercials are telling you :) >> >>Ed > >Or even worse, gcc. Most people say that their chess program runs 30% faster >when compiled with gcc. Mine too. > >/David With mine, it's reverse. and others told me the same... Rafael B. Andrist
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.