Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 16:23:23 01/21/02
Go up one level in this thread
On January 21, 2002 at 18:36:28, David Rasmussen wrote:
>On January 21, 2002 at 17:32:39, Dann Corbit wrote:
>
>>On January 21, 2002 at 16:36:45, Dann Corbit wrote:
>>
>>>On January 21, 2002 at 16:00:18, K. Burcham wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>the wrong move is 62...Kd5
>>>
>>>What is the line to draw or lose for black?
>>>
>>>Here is the position after moving Kd5 and analysis by Chess Tiger:
>>>
>>>[D]8/1R5P/8/p2k4/4pK2/2p5/8/7r w - - ce -348; acd 15; acs 1; pv Rf7 a4 Rc7 Rh6
>>>Kg5 Rxh7 Rxh7 e3 Rd7+ Ke4 Re7+ Kf3 Rf7+ Kg2 Kh4 e2 Re7 Kf2 Rf7+;|Rb7f7
>>
>>Consider:
>>8/1R5P/8/p2k4/4pK2/2p5/8/7r w - - pv Rb5+ Kc4 Rb7 a4 Rc7+ Kd3 Rd7+ Kc2 Ke3 a3
>>Ra7 Kd1 Kf2 e3+ Kf3 a2 Rd7+ Ke1 Rg7;
>>
>>After which, we have this analysis:
>> 43757045 1:58.9 -18.69 13u. 10.Rg7 a1=Q 11.h8=Q Qd1+ 12.Kxe3 Qd2+ 13.Ke4
>> Rxh8 14.Rg1+ Ke2 15.Rg2+ Kf1 16.Rg3 c2 17.Rf3+
>> Ke1 18.Kf5 c1=Q 19.Kg6 {-2002}
>>
>>Is there a way for white to wiggle out of it?
>
>So you're saying that I shouldn't have taken the draw? Actually, I just looked
>at Sjengs scores, and when they went from -3 to 0.00 and I new it had
>tablebases, I agreed to draw after 5 moves or so. Was that a mistake? If it was,
>I will spank myself...
No, I misunderstood the statement:
'The wrong move is Kd5'
since I applied it towards the original position, not what happened later.
I don't know about your game as far as what went on past the original analysis
request position and one ply forward from there.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.