Author: Ren Wu
Date: 14:30:53 07/30/02
Go up one level in this thread
On July 30, 2002 at 16:13:59, Uri Blass wrote: >I do not express an opinion about comparing computer chess and computer chinese >chess but comparison with humans is not a convincing argument. I am not sure what is the better alternative? >There are games that you need less effort to be at around 100th in the world. >I do not know if chinese chess is one of them. Well, will you say that you were not sure if chess is one of them? Xiangqi have at least as many players as chess, if not more. Xiangqi is little more complex, both in state space and game tree, than chess mathmaticly. You can take a look at allis' thesis and recent paper by Herik et al published in Artificial Intelligence. Do you know any other game that met these two conditions and still is easier to get world 100th place? Ren.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.