Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law"

Author: Brian Richardson

Date: 12:57:04 02/27/03

Go up one level in this thread

As I recall, 5 years ago folks were saying only another 10-12 years for Moore's
Law speedups...now they are still saying another 10 years or so.  I agree that
at some point physics will dictate limitations, but then there is more
parallelism.  Sun just outlined plans for running 4 threads on each of 4 cores
on a single chip in the 3-5 year time frame.  That would be roughly 16x.  Both
Intel and IBM have similar plans to extend on-chip parallelism.
Bottom Line:  Just as coding for 64 bits will become the norm soon, so will
coding for parallel searching with multiple threads.

Brian

• Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Robert Hyatt 13:43:45 02/27/03
  • Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" It is well outpaced the last years! Torstein Hall 16:30:21 02/28/03
    • Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" It is well outpaced the last years! Robert Hyatt 21:13:05 02/28/03
    • Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" It is well outpaced the last years! Matt Taylor 20:46:41 02/28/03
      • Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" It is well outpaced the last years! Robert Hyatt 21:16:36 02/28/03

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.