Author: Drexel,Michael
Date: 12:06:26 06/24/03
Go up one level in this thread
On June 24, 2003 at 14:55:14, Sune Fischer wrote: >On June 24, 2003 at 14:22:01, Reinhard Scharnagl wrote: > >>Hi Uri, >> >>On June 24, 2003 at 13:30:11, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>It seems that you assume that people tend to prefer FRC when no money is >>>involved. >>>I think that you are wrong here. > >Not really, it was just a silly responce to a silly outburst. :) Not as silly as your Comparisons often are :) > >>A lot of new players would prefer FRC because there would be no need >>to learn openings from a lot of books. FRC will therefore make chess >>more attractive to a lot of new fans, who can start very soon playing >>attractive games of FRC. > >I agree with you, but I think we also have reason to respect the classic subset >because it has such a long history. Lots of the great masters have devoted >countless hours to the analysis of the opening position, finding great gambits >and such. > >No reason to flush this down the toilet, I'm sure it has its own appeal, to >some. At the same time there should be room to experiment and evolve the game. > >Surely there must be a bit of tolerance towards eachother? > >So how come things always turn black and white in here, can't we have CCC in >colour? :) > >-S.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.