Author: James Robertson
Date: 11:04:52 01/18/99
Go up one level in this thread
On January 17, 1999 at 21:10:33, Dann Corbit wrote: >On January 16, 1999 at 17:42:16, James Robertson wrote: >[SNIP] >>That is the equivalent of saying "I'm so weak, I only manage to beat the top >>programs." I actually saw someone post "my program is weak - it only won 6-4 >>against Arasan." What an insult to Jon Dart! > >>In the same way it seems you are writing with false humility. >>How insignificant must my brain be, when I eaten alive by pansys like Gnuchess? >I have a friend (Tu Kim To) who has seen me beat GNUChess and Arasan many times. > That was, admittedly, on much weaker hardware (P180) and even at that I lost or >drew a lot more often than winning. It was a while back, so both programs are >much improved now also, I imagine. I have beaten crafty, long ago, on a Pentium >180. But I have not won a game against crafty in about 2 years and rarely even >achieve a draw. I also agree that I can be a real cocky twerp at times, even >though I don't mean to be. I often overestimate my ability and lack the humble >attitude that makes a person nice to be around. One of the reasons I like >playing against machines is that no one's ego is at stake. But I should be >careful how I speak in a forum where the program's authors are likely to be >listening. > >>>I have yet to beat CM6000 or Rebel 10 at 40/2. >>>I have not beaten Crafty in well over a year (I'll blame it on the hardware >>>upgrade to PII 300). Most of the time I lose against CM/Re/Cr, rarely even >>>achieving a draw. So those are "non-pansy" opponents. In my vernacular. >>> >>>If you are actually upset, allow me to say that your program is much stronger >> >>No, I am not upset. I get chewed up by my program, and that is all I want; a >>program that can beat me. I will get more ambitious later. :) >> >>>than any I have ever written (which is none). Also, that I was simply implying >>>that calling a program "the new Morphy" requires something more than defeating >>>GNUChess. >> >>I agree completely with this, but insulting Gnuchess is not the way to make your >>point. >I have already admitted I was wrong. I lost my so-called wager badly. What's >more, I would have kept trying if I felt that I had some chance to win. After a >few games, you can really feel when you are outclassed. I was outclassed. Most >of the time, my posts are a bit tongue-in-cheek. Communication over the >internet can come across in a way unintended. I can see by your followups that >you were genuinely offended, and I genuinely do apologize. Ok.... Sorry for misreading your thoughts. I remember one other time when I misinterpreted someone's post and argued a long thread before i realised I had made the mistake! James
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.