Author: Charles Roberson
Date: 12:54:58 02/16/05
Go up one level in this thread
On February 16, 2005 at 15:41:40, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>On February 16, 2005 at 15:31:35, Charles Roberson wrote:
>
>>On February 16, 2005 at 14:40:41, Dann Corbit wrote:
>>
>>>On February 16, 2005 at 13:40:07, Russell Reagan wrote:
>>>
>>>>On February 16, 2005 at 10:46:39, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On February 15, 2005 at 18:38:43, John Merlino wrote:
>>>>>
>My original intent for crafty was that someone would take the complete program,
>and replace just the part they were interested in fiddling with. Say the
>evaluation. Or the search. Or a new move generation approach. Then they could
>test their ideas to see if they were good, bad or ugly. But once competition in
>a chess event is attempted, I think the non-unique parts of the code have to be
>the product of the author's work product. Eval, search, anything that can take
>a given input and produce more than one correct output.
Yes, that is the start of what I am looking for. "anything that can take
a given input and produce more than one correct output."
Thus, a legal move generator is clonable, but the move ordering
mechanism is not.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.