Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: The importance of opening books -- a simple experiment

Author: Sune Fischer

Date: 11:15:57 02/17/05

Go up one level in this thread


On February 17, 2005 at 14:03:30, Tord Romstad wrote:

Well 700 Elo is equivalent to about 5-6 pawns material advantage,
I don't think I have ever seen that in an actual game much less
seen it on average.

I can believe in a good book giving half a pawn or ~50 Elo,
not much more than that is realistic IMO.

Perhaps the person you refer to is talking about a book
with "perfect chess" reaching 80 plies deep? :)

-S.

>A couple of days ago, a well-known programmer and regular
>poster here on the CCC claimed that a good opening book
>was worth at least 700 Elo points.  I thought this number
>looked completely outrageous, and decided to do a simple
>experiment.
>
>I am the author of a basic and minimalistic UCI chess engine
>called Glaurung.  Source code and executables for Mac OS X,
>Linux and Windows can be found at the following URL:
>
>http://www.math.uio.no/~romstad/glaurung/glaurung.html
>
>Recently, I have played some test matches with Glaurung
>against the strongest engine I have on my compter: Hiarcs
>9.6.  Not surprisingly, all such matches end in crushing
>victories for Hiarcs.  The last match I played ended
>75-25 in Hiarcs' favor.
>
>As a crude test of the "good book=700 Elo" claim, I have
>now repeated the match with identical program versions
>and conditions, except that Hiarcs was now playing without
>an opening book.  Assuming that Hiarcs' book is worth 700
>Elo, the expected result of this second match would be
>something like 95-5 in _Glaurung's_ favor.
>
>The actual result of the second match was very close to
>the first match:  Hiarcs won by 72-28.
>
>As far as I can see, this means that at least one of the
>following must be true:
>
>a) The statement "good book=700 Elo" is lightyears away
>from the truth.
>
>b) Hiarcs has an extremely bad opening book, and with a
>half decent opening book it would be several hundred
>rating points ahead of Shredder.
>
>
>Tord



This page took 0.02 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.