Author: Uri Blass
Date: 08:50:02 05/16/05
Go up one level in this thread
On May 16, 2005 at 11:01:44, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >On May 16, 2005 at 10:25:37, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On May 16, 2005 at 09:43:20, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >> >>>On May 16, 2005 at 08:52:59, Matthias Gemuh wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>>Da ich auf folgender Seite nämlich las, dass Patriot 2.0 (noch Beta) ... >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>Why did Vladimir take Fruit-TogaII back to beta stage after renaming it as >>>>Patriot 2.0 ? >>>>BTW, Patriot 3.0 may be stronger than Shredder 9 if Fabien works hard on Fruit 3 >>>>! >>>> >>>>Matthias. >>> >>> Hi Matthias >>> Your point of view seems very optimistic. At the moment >>> Shredder 9 is about 50 Elo stronger than all other top >>> engines ... not to talk about the difference to the best >>> amateur engines. Or what's the reason for your assumption? >>> Kurt >> >>I think that Fabian is a very good programmer and if he work hard nothing is >>impossible. >> >>I guess that Fabian is the best programmer from the programmers who write chess >>programs. >> >>Of course his program is not the best but considering the little time that he >>worked on fruit I consider him as the best programmer. >> >>Uri > > Hi Uri > I do not know Fabien Letouzey and if you say he is a good > (the best) chess programmer this may be true. I also do not know him and my guess is based on results. But to assume > that an amateur programmer with his limited time to work > on his engine will be able to at once head at the top seems > nevertheless very optimistic to me. Have we seen a new top > program (rank 1-4) coming up in the last 3-4 years? No, the > best are still the same with latest version. Correct but I think that the difference today is smaller. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.