Author: Stefan Meyer-Kahlen
Date: 02:51:12 02/20/99
Go up one level in this thread
On February 19, 1999 at 08:32:52, Peter Kasinski wrote: >Stefan, > >Sorry if I gave an unfair assessment of the many new features in Shredder. >By no means was this an attempt at a comprehensive review. I leave that to KK. > >On the other hand, I am surprised that my post would have triggered a question >"what's wrong with Shredder?". I was clearly impressed with your program. >Even shortly after Paris I posted here congratulating you and asking why >Shredder gets so little respect. Its showing in both main and blitz event was >excellent and clearly demonstrated Jakarta was no fluke. It was not your post that triggered my reaction. If you feel personally attacked I am sorry. I really appreciate it if somebody enjoys Shredder, honestly. >Now, as a self-proclaimed Shredder fan and defender :-) >I have a couple of questions: > >a) What do you think about a dynamic tablebase lookup? This is already in my current version of Shredder, so the next release will have it. >b) Is there a parallel Shredder in our future? Yes, there are plans to make it parallel. The next big tournament is a non micro event, too. We'll see... (to Bob: Don't worry, I won't copy your SMP algorithms :-) ) Stefan
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.