Author: Uri Blass
Date: 07:29:12 09/05/05
Go up one level in this thread
On September 05, 2005 at 10:17:52, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >On September 05, 2005 at 09:32:33, Uri Blass wrote: > >>I think that it is a good reason not to buy fritz or Junior because you cannot >>test them against a strong engine like Zappa. >> >>It may be that in the future more strong engines will be added to the list so >>you will be able to put the same reason to avoid buying chessbase programs. >> >>Uri > > >Why a chessplayer should test FRITZ against ZAPPA? Give me one good reason, Uri. >A good chessplayer plays against chessprograms and knows how strong they are. >From the view of human chess it is uninteresting to know what chess engine beats >another because the results are all insignificant. When you've a significant >result the next version of the programs is on the market. Do you have a single >serious argument that could address my verdict? Which isn't "mine" but from >science. I do not think that results are not significant. They may not prove without doubt which engine is stronger but they may help to have an opinion about that question. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.