Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Mate in 19 - Toga thoughts (Diagram) (NT)

Author: m.d.hurd

Date: 01:47:04 12/01/05

Go up one level in this thread

On December 01, 2005 at 04:08:14, Steve Lim wrote:

>Nice post Mig.
>
>[D]3n3k/bp3pp1/8/8/R1Q2R2/6p1/B2p1PP1/q1rn2K1 w - - 0 1

New game - Fritz 9,
3n3k/bp3pp1/8/8/R1Q2R2/6p1/B2p1PP1/q1rn2K1 w - - 0 1

Analysis by Fritz 9:

1.Rh4+ Kg8 2.Rh8+ Kxh8 3.Qh4+ Kg8 4.Qxd8+ Kh7 5.Qh4+ Kg8 6.Qd8+
  =  (0.00)   Depth: 7/33   00:00:00  34kN
1.Rh4+ Kg8 2.Rh8+ Kxh8 3.Qh4+ Kg8 4.Qxd8+ Kh7 5.Qh4+ Kg8 6.Qd8+
  =  (0.00)   Depth: 8/33   00:00:00  80kN
1.Rh4+ Kg8 2.Rh8+ Kxh8 3.Qh4+ Kg8 4.Qxd8+ Kh7 5.Qh4+ Kg8 6.Qd8+
  =  (0.00)   Depth: 9/26   00:00:00  106kN
1.Rh4+ Kg8 2.Rh8+ Kxh8 3.Qh4+ Kg8 4.Qxd8+ Kh7 5.Qh4+ Kg8 6.Qd8+
  =  (0.00)   Depth: 10/35   00:00:00  245kN
1.Rh4+ Kg8 2.Rh8+ Kxh8 3.Qh4+ Kg8 4.Qxd8+ Kh7 5.Qh4+ Kg8 6.Qd8+
  =  (0.00)   Depth: 11/29   00:00:00  419kN
1.Rh4+ Kg8 2.Rh8+ Kxh8 3.Qh4+ Kg8 4.Qxd8+ Kh7 5.Qh4+ Kg8 6.Qd8+
  =  (0.00)   Depth: 12/32   00:00:00  833kN
1.Rh4+ Kg8 2.Rh8+ Kxh8 3.Qh4+ Kg8 4.Qxd8+ Kh7 5.Qh4+ Kg8 6.Qd8+
  =  (0.00)   Depth: 13/42   00:00:01  1764kN
1.Rh4+ Kg8 2.Rh8+ Kxh8 3.Qh4+ Kg8 4.Qxd8+ Kh7 5.Qh4+ Kg8 6.Qd8+
  =  (0.00)   Depth: 14/42   00:00:03  3953kN
1.Rh4+ Kg8 2.Rh8+ Kxh8 3.Qh4+ Kg8 4.Qxd8+ Kh7 5.Qh4+ Kg8 6.Qd8+
  =  (0.00)   Depth: 15/44   00:00:08  9953kN
1.Rh4+ Kg8 2.Rh8+ Kxh8 3.Qh4+ Kg8 4.Qxd8+ Kh7 5.Qh4+ Kg8 6.Qd8+
  =  (0.00)   Depth: 16/45   00:00:17  21461kN
1.Rh4+ Kg8 2.Rh8+ Kxh8 3.Qh4+ Kg8 4.Qxd8+ Kh7 5.Qh4+ Kg8 6.Qd8+
  =  (0.00)   Depth: 17/50   00:00:36  45935kN
1.Rh4+ Kg8 2.Rh8+ Kxh8 3.Qh4+ Kg8 4.Qxd8+ Kh7 5.Qh4+ Kg8 6.Qd8+
  =  (0.00)   Depth: 18/53   00:01:19  100257kN
1.Rh4+!
  +-  (#19)   Depth: 19/55   00:02:02  155823kN
1.Rh4+!
  +-  (#19)   Depth: 19/55   00:04:30  352084kN

Mike

• Re: Mate in 19 - Toga thoughts (Diagram) (NT) Maybe 18? chandler yergin 02:04:32 12/01/05
  • Probably not 18, because Jouni Uski 02:26:09 12/01/05
    • Re: Probably not 18, because chandler yergin 06:57:16 12/01/05
      • Re: Probably not 18, because F. Huber 07:08:40 12/01/05
        • Re: Probably not 18, because CORRECT It's 19 chandler yergin 07:27:59 12/01/05

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.