Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 03:06:36 12/03/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 03, 2005 at 05:42:15, Ómar Skúlason wrote: >Hi all! > >I guess there are a few here that are interested in the Fruit family and how >they are getting along and communicating between them selfs. >I guess also that Fruit 2.2.1 is widely accepted as the strongest "all over" >A littlebit stronger than Fritz 9. > >Next in line of the fruits is Toga II 1.1. >Toga maybe the strongest at very short time controles such as 1+1. > >And thereafter I think GambitFruit is _still_ weeker than its cousins but it (or >he) is very intersting for the experiments that "one" of its authors is >conducting. >Note that I use "I guess" and "I think" for my safety. Sorry, i cannot agree. IMO togaII 1.1 is stronger then fruit2.2.1. I cannot say much about Gambit-Fruit. there is a new version. the older versions were IMO weaker then togaII 1.1 and weaker then fruit2.2.1. IMO togaII 1.1 is stronger then fruit 2.2.1 and f9. We will see how the new gambit fruit develops. it might be that it has come closer to toga... maybe it can overtake it. we have to wait for more data.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.