Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 03:24:34 12/03/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 03, 2005 at 05:03:20, Ryan B. wrote: >Clearly the test is not proof of play strength but is fair indicator of play >style. > >Fruit 2.1 >62 of 113 matching moves >11/4/2005 12:26:21 AM, Total time: 12:20:40 AM >Rated time: 09:30 = 570 Seconds > >Toga 1.1 >57 of 113 matching moves >11/4/2005 12:47:04 AM, Total time: 12:41:23 AM >Rated time: 09:49 = 589 Seconds > >Gambit Fruit Beta 4b >67 of 113 matching moves >11/4/2005 1:49:28 AM, Total time: 1:43:46 AM >Rated time: 08:49 = 529 Seconds this would explain why i do believe that GambitFruit Beta4b has made a jump in playing strength. I have the feeling it could be stronger then Fruit and Toga. But lets see how many data we get. Which POSITIONAL test epd you run and which PRG you use to run them ?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.