Author: Ryan B.
Date: 03:37:31 12/03/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 03, 2005 at 06:24:34, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On December 03, 2005 at 05:03:20, Ryan B. wrote: > >>Clearly the test is not proof of play strength but is fair indicator of play >>style. >> >>Fruit 2.1 >>62 of 113 matching moves >>11/4/2005 12:26:21 AM, Total time: 12:20:40 AM >>Rated time: 09:30 = 570 Seconds >> >>Toga 1.1 >>57 of 113 matching moves >>11/4/2005 12:47:04 AM, Total time: 12:41:23 AM >>Rated time: 09:49 = 589 Seconds >> >>Gambit Fruit Beta 4b >>67 of 113 matching moves >>11/4/2005 1:49:28 AM, Total time: 1:43:46 AM >>Rated time: 08:49 = 529 Seconds > > >this would explain why i do believe that GambitFruit Beta4b has made a jump in >playing strength. I have the feeling it could be stronger then Fruit and Toga. >But lets see how many data we get. > >Which POSITIONAL test epd you run and which PRG you use to run them ? I used Arena and got the positional.epd from Dann Corbits ftp site. Also in Beta 4 the rebel reductions now seem to help tactically with very little positional drawbacks when turned on now. They can be turned on in UCI options. I think a lot can be gained with tuning, mostly in the king safety area. Thanks, Ryan
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.