Author: Gareth McCaughan
Date: 02:23:21 03/30/99
Go up one level in this thread
[Dan Andersson:] > It sounds like a variation of conspiracy numbers search. Sort of. It looks simpler than CN search to me, and maybe a little more human-like. Again, being human-like may be a bad thing in view of the fact that no one has ever (so far as I know) produced a really good computer chess program that thinks even slightly like a human does. Incidentally, I suggest the following helpful metaphor for variable-depth searches of the kind I proposed: the machine isn't searching each line to a fixed depth, it's searching each line until it gets bored. Moves that appear less good bore it more... :-)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.