Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: A plea to all computer chess enthusiasts (short)

Author: Dann Corbit

Date: 11:08:31 02/09/06

Go up one level in this thread


On February 08, 2006 at 22:17:11, Will Singleton wrote:

>>The very rapid
>>improvement in the general level of strength isn't a recent
>>development; it has been going on for several years.  The gap
>>between the new and improving programs and the established
>>professionals has been constantly diminishing, and it has long
>>been clear that it was only a matter of time before some of the
>>new engines would surpass the old giants.
>
>Uh huh.  It might have long been clear to you, but was that before Fruit or
>after?  I recall when Ruffian came out, people could scarcely believe its
>strength.  No one, folks said, could develop such a strong amateur program in
>relative secrecy, and then just burst on the scene.  But Ruffian never
>approached commercial strength.
>
>And then came Fruit.  Not an evolutionary change, not forseen, not anticipated.
>One day the commercials ruled, then Fruit came out.  That was the change.  Only
>after that did programs begin to "surpass the old giants."  I'm not criticizing,
>only pointing out that the change was sudden, not evolutionary, and no one
>predicted it.
>
>Unless, as you say, you did.  Where was that post?

Junior and Chess Tiger were just like Fruit.  It's just history repeating
itself.  And it is going to happen again and again



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.