Author: Tony Thomas Karippa
Date: 04:29:27 02/11/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 10, 2006 at 05:12:10, Tord Romstad wrote: >On February 10, 2006 at 03:09:31, Tony Thomas Karippa wrote: > >>>I hope I am wrong, but recently I have often had the impression that >>>the general interest in weak chess engines is waning, and that the >>>top engines get all the attention. >> >>Why are you complaining, your engine isnt weak, at least not in blitz. Its the >>best freely available blitzer avilable, on my computer, not considering Rybka >>free version and Toga. > >Thanks! It isn't quite as good as you think, though. Fruit 2.1 and Spike >are both clearly stronger at blitz, and there are many others of approximately >the same strength as Glaurung (Naum, Pro Deo, Ruffian 1.x, WildCat, SlowChess, >Jonny, etc.). Based on the data I have seen, I actually think that Glaurung >is somewhat stronger at slower time controls, but it is still clearly behind >Fruit and Spike. Well, may be Glaurung likes my computer. Who knows? Or it could be the new book that comes with Glaurung. I have seen it coming out of the book with a somewhat clear advantage. It could be so many other reasons. I used Glaurung on both of my computers and on the slower one, Glaurung is slightly behind spike and Fruit, but clearly ahead of Naum, prodeo, etc...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.