Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Question to Uri

Author: Wayne Lowrance

Date: 08:45:22 03/06/06

Go up one level in this thread


On March 06, 2006 at 07:48:40, Uri Blass wrote:

>On March 06, 2006 at 07:09:18, Uri Blass wrote:
>
>>On March 06, 2006 at 02:30:27, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>>
>>>On March 06, 2006 at 02:17:43, Jouni Uski wrote:
>>>
>>>>I read here, that You don't have Fritz 9! Why? I think it still is the
>>>>best program for long analysis. E.g. Rybka beta is far behind and even
>>>>Hiarcs 10 is not quite as good. So what's your reason? Is it the short
>>>>main line may be? I am just curious. What is the best engine then for long
>>>>analysis?
>>>>
>>>>Jouni
>>>
>>>      There is no need to have all engines. Much more important
>>>      is how to use computer programs most efficiently for analysis
>>>      purposes ... and here, it's wrong or at least not successful
>>>      to start engine X and waiting some hours for good moves. Uri
>>>      is a strong correspondence player who knows how to work with
>>>      computer programs and he perhaps can easily do without Fritz 9.
>>>      And furthermore: short main line is no disadvantage because
>>>      you can't trust what engines show after the third half move.
>>>      Best regards
>>>      Kurt
>>
>>I partly disagree.
>>
>>More engines of course can be an advantage and also long analysis can be an
>>advantage but I believe that fritz9 is not the best engine for analysis and I do
>>not need all engines.
>
>one correction
>
>It is not exactly that I do not need all engines but that the relative value of
>engines is smaller after having the best engines that is the important thing.
>
>Note also that computer are used for long analysis not only in the positions
>that I play but also in possible lines some plies after it.
>
>The practical importance of computers is also to make wins shorter.
>If I see that I have good chances to win some game then it is important not only
>to win but to find the fastest way to win because finding the fastest way to win
>may means that I can finish the game earlier so later I will have more computer
>time for other games.
>
>Uri

What engine do you find most useful to you in your analysis. Thank you
Wayne



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.