Author: James T. Walker
Date: 04:52:20 03/07/06
Go up one level in this thread
On March 07, 2006 at 06:03:10, Bernhard Bauer wrote: >On March 06, 2006 at 22:25:28, K. Burcham wrote: > >> >> >> [D] 6n1/1N4p1/6Pp/1B1NpP2/P2kP3/1p3PpK/2P4P/rb2b3 w - - 0 1 >> >>Glaurung 1.0.1: >> >>1.Nd8 Kc5 2.Ne6+ Kd6 3.Nb6 Ke7 4.Nc8+ Kf6 5.Nf8 Kg5 6.hxg3 Bxg3 7.Ne6+ Kf6 8.Nb6 >>Ke7 9.Nd5+ Kd6 10.Nd8 Bxc2 11.Nb7# >> +- (#11) Depth: 12/40 00:00:02 771kN >>1.Nd8 Kc5 2.Ne6+ Kd6 3.Nb6 Ke7 4.Nc8+ Kf6 5.Nf8 Kg5 6.hxg3 Bxg3 7.Ne6+ Kf6 8.Nb6 >>Ke7 9.Nd5+ Kd6 10.Nd8 Kc5 11.Nb7+ Kd4 12.c3# >> +- (#12) Depth: 13/40 00:00:03 945kN >>1.Nd8 Kc5 2.Ne6+ Kd6 3.Nb6 Ke7 4.Nc8+ Kf6 5.Nf8 Kg5 6.hxg3 Bxg3 7.Ne6+ Kf6 8.Nb6 >>Ke7 9.Nd5+ Kd6 10.Nd8 Kc5 11.Nb7+ Kd4 12.c3# >> +- (#12) Depth: 14/40 00:00:04 1174kN >>1.Nd8 Kc5 2.Ne6+ Kd6 3.Nb6 Ke7 4.Nc8+ Kf6 5.Nf8 Kg5 6.hxg3 Bxg3 7.Ne6+ Kf6 8.Nb6 >>Ke7 9.Nd5+ Kd6 10.Nd8 Kc5 11.Nb7+ Kd4 12.c3# >> +- (#12) Depth: 15/40 00:00:05 1671kN >>1.Nd8 Kc5 2.Ne6+ Kd6 3.Nb6 Ke7 4.Nc8+ Kf6 5.Nf8 Kg5 6.hxg3 Bxg3 7.Ne6+ Kf6 8.Nb6 >>Ke7 9.Nd5+ Kd6 10.Nd8 Kc5 11.Nb7+ Kd4 12.c3# >> +- (#12) Depth: 16/40 00:00:06 2528kN >>1.Nd8 Kc5 2.Ne6+ Kd6 3.Nb6 Ke7 4.Nc8+ Kf6 5.Nf8 Kg5 6.hxg3 Bxg3 7.Ne6+ Kf6 8.Nb6 >>Ke7 9.Nd5+ Kd6 10.Nd8 Kc5 11.Nb7+ Kd4 12.c3# >> +- (#12) Depth: 17/40 00:00:07 4769kN >>1.Nd8 Kc5 2.Ne6+ Kd6 3.Nb6 Ke7 4.Nc8+ Kf6 5.Nf8 Kg5 6.hxg3 Bxg3 7.Ne6+ Kf6 8.Nb6 >>Ke7 9.Nd5+ Kd6 10.Nd8 Kc5 11.Nb7+ Kd4 12.c3# >> +- (#12) Depth: 18/40 00:00:12 8385kN >>1.Nd8 Kc5 2.Ne6+ Kd6 3.Nb6 Ke7 4.Nc8+ Kf6 5.Nf8 Kg5 6.hxg3 Bxg3 7.Ne6+ Kf6 8.Nb6 >>Ke7 9.Nd5+ Kd6 10.Nd8 Kc5 11.Nb7+ Kd4 12.c3# >> +- (#12) Depth: 19/40 00:00:27 17879kN > >Amasing. Specially the mate in 11 within 2 sec :-) >regards >Bernhard Yes! :-) Wouldn't that be considered a bug? Announcing a mate in 11 when there is none. Jim
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.