Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Sorry John, Glaurung faster on this one

Author: Tord Romstad

Date: 07:27:58 03/07/06

Go up one level in this thread


On March 07, 2006 at 07:52:20, James T. Walker wrote:

>On March 07, 2006 at 06:03:10, Bernhard Bauer wrote:
>
>>Amasing. Specially the mate in 11 within 2 sec  :-)
>>regards
>>Bernhard
>
>Yes! :-)  Wouldn't that be considered a bug?  Announcing a mate in 11 when there
>is none.

In the author's opinion, it's not a bug.  Glaurung is a chess playing program,
and not a mate solver.  As long as the program doesn't announce a mate when
there is no mate, I'm happy.  I'm surprised that so many people care about
this, and even more surprised that those who care use a normal chess playing
program instead of a mate solver like Chest.

Adjusting mate scores in the hash table in order to ensure that all mate
counts are correct would be trivial, but it would add more clutter to my
already too messy program.  Perhaps I'll do it some day, but don't hold your
breath.  If you really can't stand watching occasional incorrect mate counts,
just grab the source code and do the necessary changes yourself.

Tord



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.