Author: Micheal Cummings
Date: 19:34:19 05/26/99
Go up one level in this thread
On May 26, 1999 at 21:08:55, Melvin S. Schwartz wrote: > >Hi Francis, > >The position you presented along with the results only further clouds the issue. >Rebel 10 did well on the test; however, my rebel 10 played Rxb7 on the 26th move >against GM Rohde. Hiarcs 7 correctly played Bg2. Both were set at 40/2. Now, >where does that leave us? Also, if you remember that position I presented, Rebel >10 played Bxb2+ while Hiarcs 7 played Bh2+. So, it appears that test positions >of this sort will yield inconclusive evidence. > >Further...does that test mean Chessmaster 6000 is superior to Hiarcs 7? > >Regards, >Mel I have found that in Analysis, CM6K finds most positions faster than the rest. And as for superior, well more games need to be played. But as you would notice on the SSDF, CM6K is currently No1 !!!!!!
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.