Author: Jouni Uski
Date: 23:03:41 05/26/99
Go up one level in this thread
On May 26, 1999 at 22:34:19, Micheal Cummings wrote: > >On May 26, 1999 at 21:08:55, Melvin S. Schwartz wrote: > >> >>Hi Francis, >> >>The position you presented along with the results only further clouds the issue. >>Rebel 10 did well on the test; however, my rebel 10 played Rxb7 on the 26th move >>against GM Rohde. Hiarcs 7 correctly played Bg2. Both were set at 40/2. Now, >>where does that leave us? Also, if you remember that position I presented, Rebel >>10 played Bxb2+ while Hiarcs 7 played Bh2+. So, it appears that test positions >>of this sort will yield inconclusive evidence. >> >>Further...does that test mean Chessmaster 6000 is superior to Hiarcs 7? >> >>Regards, >>Mel > >I have found that in Analysis, CM6K finds most positions faster than the rest. >And as for superior, well more games need to be played. But as you would notice >on the SSDF, CM6K is currently No1 !!!!!! Warning: CM6K has already lost 20 - 30 points on the SSDF! Means up to 5 positions... Jouni
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.