Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Interesting statement from Ossi Weiner about Nunn test

Author: Enrique Irazoqui

Date: 16:07:06 09/17/98

Go up one level in this thread


On September 17, 1998 at 18:23:31, Thorsten Czub wrote:

>On September 17, 1998 at 17:46:21, Enrique Irazoqui wrote:
>
>>>and frederic paid for this... brilliant.
>>
>>In other words, Nunn came with a crooked test to favor Fritz. Old song of yours
>>and utter nonsense.
>
>it is written in css !

CSS never wrote that Nunn came with a crooked test that would favor Fritz.
Commisioned by Chessbase or by the Pope of Rome, trying to devise a fair test
for chess engines has nothing to do with being crooked.

> I really don't know what you have.

A bad case of trying to be objective.

> it is all written in
>css.

No.

> you only have to read it.
>John was asked to do this test. he did it for fred. for chessBase. not because
>he wanted it to do. he was asked to do it.

He was asked to devise a test that... etc. etc. etc....

>If you cannot read, thats not my problem.

Thanks.

Enrique

>take css and read it, there anything is written and published.
>he was ordered to make the test. and he did. and the test proves what it should
>prove: fritz is the best = smoking is not causing cancer, signed doctor malboro.
>
>
>>If anything, one might say that having few positions, the test can be already
>>cooked by more than one. Although certainly not by Mark and his Hiarcs 6 playing
>>Moritz games.
>>
>>Enrique
>
>cstal e.g. plays strong because it makes its own middle game. if you set up a
>position within the middle-game, you stop it to take advantages out of the
>king-safety mistakes in the middle game.
>if a bird is good in flying, but you don't allow it to fly, it cannot show it's
>strength.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.