Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Static Exchange Evaluation (SEE) for pruning in quiescence (?)

Author: Tord Romstad

Date: 11:48:33 08/19/03

Go up one level in this thread

On August 19, 2003 at 13:56:53, Dan Andersson wrote:

> Dynamically updating attackboards is fairly fast. And you get legal moves and
>captures as an added benefit. I favour the attackboard board representation
>where each square is an unsigned 32 bit integer. One bit per piece no less. It
>can readily be combined with any other scheme AFAIK.

With only one bit per piece, how do you distinguish x-ray attacks from normal
attacks?

Tord

• Re: Static Exchange Evaluation (SEE) for pruning in quiescence (?) Dan Andersson 12:21:23 08/19/03
  • Re: Static Exchange Evaluation (SEE) for pruning in quiescence (?) Tord Romstad 08:57:03 08/21/03
    • Re: Static Exchange Evaluation (SEE) for pruning in quiescence (?) Dan Andersson 16:22:44 08/21/03

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.