Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Ten years later: revising EPD/FEN/PGN

Author: Koundinya Veluri

Date: 22:45:27 09/09/03

Go up one level in this thread

On September 09, 2003 at 18:33:22, Steven Edwards wrote:

>4. The centipawn evaluation operand type needs a mate score indication
>correction.

I would also like to be able to use the "dm" (direct mate) opcode with negative
values. So dm -3 would mean the active color gets mated in 3 moves. The "dm"
opcode is more convenient to use than "ce" if your program doesn't use the EPD
mate score format internally.

Koundinya

• Re: Ten years later: revising EPD/FEN/PGN Robert Hyatt 11:34:58 09/10/03
• Re: Ten years later: revising EPD/FEN/PGN Steven Edwards 00:04:11 09/10/03
  • Re: Ten years later: revising EPD/FEN/PGN Dieter Buerssner 13:20:17 09/10/03
  • Re: EPD: opponent mates Rafael Andrist 02:30:31 09/10/03

This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.