Author: Matthew Hull
Date: 11:41:39 12/09/03
Go up one level in this thread
On December 09, 2003 at 14:29:13, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >On December 09, 2003 at 10:24:12, Omid David Tabibi wrote: > >>I don't understand all this engine/interfacedifferentiation. It is one chess >>playing unit, and does not matter whether it is built of only an engine, engine >>+ interface, or an interface with a built-in engine... > >I disagree, I think the difference in this case is especially important. If the GUI can play half the game (opening moves), then it is part of the chess-playing software. The engine/GUI are one chess-playing entitiy. Therefore, you point is egregiously in error. > >>There is no border line between an engine and an interface. For example, in >>WinBoard the engine is solely responsible for the draw claim, but in the UCI >>protocol the interface is mainly responsible for claiming the draw. > >Isn't the above directly contradicting itself? > >-- >GCP
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.