Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 09:38:37 09/07/05
Go up one level in this thread
On September 07, 2005 at 06:31:25, Gabor Szots wrote: >>The nonsense that he said is not about UCI >> >>I will give you an example to nonsense that he said few years ago against Crafty >>when he said that it is weaker than the weakest participant in WCCC and has >>rating of 1800 >> >>see http://chessprogramming.org/cccsearch/ccc.php?art_id=339236 >> >>There are clearly worse things that he said in the past. >> >>Uri > >The things he wrote may have been utter nonsense in some cases but he also had >right views several times. True he often indulged in exaggerations and behaved >like a child but I never noticed malevolence from his part. Just to the >contrary, he has always been helpful and open to share his ideas. I think he was >handicapped by the fact that people here often show overrespect towards Rober >Hyatt and were biased against Vincent whatever the case may have been. Surely he >could not bear it, that may have been the reason why he so often overreacted. > >That is my view. Of course, he did a disservice to himself, but I don't find the >things he said a well-founded reason not to buy from him. > >It is quality that counts. Many people buy from chessbase although the service >they provide is shameful and their ignorance is annoying (I have read it here >several times, there is no debate about it). Let's see what Vincent can provide >and disregard him when it turns out that he sells crap. > >Gábor Dude, you cannot change history. Before you are making such statements you should at first and at least know history. What your Vincent had openly uttered in Bob's direction that is in neighborhood of "crime", I mean, it's not just opinion. He said, probably out of normal mind, that Bob, an academic guy, would have - intentiously! - faked and cheated his own test results; it was in the topic about gaining through N numbers of parallel processors. That is, believe me, even worse as if he had accused Bob of child abuse, you know. This short example hopefully shows you how completely wrong you were with your rescury action. NB that cheating results and data as such is the end of the existence of academics.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.