Author: Gabor Szots
Date: 10:05:53 09/07/05
Go up one level in this thread
On September 07, 2005 at 12:38:37, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >On September 07, 2005 at 06:31:25, Gabor Szots wrote: > >>>The nonsense that he said is not about UCI >>> >>>I will give you an example to nonsense that he said few years ago against Crafty >>>when he said that it is weaker than the weakest participant in WCCC and has >>>rating of 1800 >>> >>>see http://chessprogramming.org/cccsearch/ccc.php?art_id=339236 >>> >>>There are clearly worse things that he said in the past. >>> >>>Uri >> >>The things he wrote may have been utter nonsense in some cases but he also had >>right views several times. True he often indulged in exaggerations and behaved >>like a child but I never noticed malevolence from his part. Just to the >>contrary, he has always been helpful and open to share his ideas. I think he was >>handicapped by the fact that people here often show overrespect towards Rober >>Hyatt and were biased against Vincent whatever the case may have been. Surely he >>could not bear it, that may have been the reason why he so often overreacted. >> >>That is my view. Of course, he did a disservice to himself, but I don't find the >>things he said a well-founded reason not to buy from him. >> >>It is quality that counts. Many people buy from chessbase although the service >>they provide is shameful and their ignorance is annoying (I have read it here >>several times, there is no debate about it). Let's see what Vincent can provide >>and disregard him when it turns out that he sells crap. >> >>Gábor > > >Dude, >you cannot change history. Before you are making such statements you should at >first and at least know history. What your Vincent had openly uttered in Bob's >direction that is in neighborhood of "crime", I mean, it's not just opinion. He >said, probably out of normal mind, that Bob, an academic guy, would have - >intentiously! - faked and cheated his own test results; it was in the topic >about gaining through N numbers of parallel processors. That is, believe me, >even worse as if he had accused Bob of child abuse, you know. This short example >hopefully shows you how completely wrong you were with your rescury action. > >NB that cheating results and data as such is the end of the existence of >academics. I did not know that. Still, those times are over (I hope). And it is not Robert Hyatt who said he would not buy from "my" Vincent. Dude
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.