Author: chandler yergin
Date: 14:14:33 12/02/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 02, 2005 at 16:49:33, F. Huber wrote: >On December 02, 2005 at 16:12:40, chandler yergin wrote: > >>On December 02, 2005 at 16:06:30, Paul Jacobean Sacral wrote: >> >>>On December 02, 2005 at 15:58:17, chandler yergin wrote: >>> >>>>On December 02, 2005 at 15:49:11, Paul Jacobean Sacral wrote: >>> >>>>>Call it bug, mistake, error or whatever you like: If the shortest possible mate >>>>>in a position is #14 and an engine displays #11, there is something wrong. >>>>Nope! >>>>The engine sees a line it calls it! That is what it's supposed to do! >>>>"Engines evaluate all moves 1/2 move i.e. 1 Ply at a time." >>>>Nothing more.. nothing less. >>>>The deeper the search the better the evaluation. >>>>On deeper search it found there was only a Mate in 14. >>> >>>From YOUR OWN posting: >>> >>>1.Qd3+ f5 2.Qxg3+ >>> +- (#14) Depth: 16/16 00:00:01 247kN >>>1.Qd3+ f5 2.Qxg3+ Kf6 3.Qd6+ Kg5 4.Rh5+ Kxh5 5.Qxd2 >>> +- (#11) Depth: 17/18 00:00:02 596kN >>> >>>Depth 16: #14 -> correct >>>Depth 17: #11 -> wrong >>> >>>Would you please accept that we have a problem here :-)) >>NO! >> >>"Engines evaluate all moves 1/2 move i.e. 1 Ply at a time." >>Nothing more.. nothing less. >>The deeper the search the better the evaluation. >>On deeper search it found there was only a Mate in 14. >>You don't understand this? >>Agree or not? >>Thanks, >>Chan > >Are you a parrot? Only if you don't understand what I write.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.