Author: F. Huber
Date: 13:49:33 12/02/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 02, 2005 at 16:12:40, chandler yergin wrote: >On December 02, 2005 at 16:06:30, Paul Jacobean Sacral wrote: > >>On December 02, 2005 at 15:58:17, chandler yergin wrote: >> >>>On December 02, 2005 at 15:49:11, Paul Jacobean Sacral wrote: >> >>>>Call it bug, mistake, error or whatever you like: If the shortest possible mate >>>>in a position is #14 and an engine displays #11, there is something wrong. >>>Nope! >>>The engine sees a line it calls it! That is what it's supposed to do! >>>"Engines evaluate all moves 1/2 move i.e. 1 Ply at a time." >>>Nothing more.. nothing less. >>>The deeper the search the better the evaluation. >>>On deeper search it found there was only a Mate in 14. >> >>From YOUR OWN posting: >> >>1.Qd3+ f5 2.Qxg3+ >> +- (#14) Depth: 16/16 00:00:01 247kN >>1.Qd3+ f5 2.Qxg3+ Kf6 3.Qd6+ Kg5 4.Rh5+ Kxh5 5.Qxd2 >> +- (#11) Depth: 17/18 00:00:02 596kN >> >>Depth 16: #14 -> correct >>Depth 17: #11 -> wrong >> >>Would you please accept that we have a problem here :-)) >NO! > >"Engines evaluate all moves 1/2 move i.e. 1 Ply at a time." >Nothing more.. nothing less. >The deeper the search the better the evaluation. >On deeper search it found there was only a Mate in 14. >You don't understand this? >Agree or not? >Thanks, >Chan Are you a parrot?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.