Author: Russell Reagan
Date: 14:10:10 07/13/03
Go up one level in this thread
On July 13, 2003 at 13:17:56, Bas Hamstra wrote: >It is used *extremely* intensive. Therefore I assumed that most of the time the >table sits in cache. But apparently no... Makes you wonder about other simple >lookup's. A lot of 10 cycle penalties, it seems. Hi Bas, Why you say "10 cycles"? I thought memory latency was many more cycles (~75 - 150+).
This page took 0.04 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.