Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Shredder wins in Graz after controversy

Author: Omid David Tabibi

Date: 07:24:12 12/09/03

Go up one level in this thread


On December 09, 2003 at 09:49:47, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote:

>On December 09, 2003 at 09:25:55, Sune Fischer wrote:
>
>>I think the logic is quite clear, Jonny lost on purpose because he didn't feel
>>Shredder should lose the WCCC due to a silly bug:
>>
>>"Apparently the Shredder interface contained a bug which allowed it to repeat
>>postitions in a totally winning position. The program Jonny had seen this and
>>claimed the draw (while displaying a 0.00 score). But as Johannes Zwanzger >later said on the Playchess.com server: "I did not want to draw the game in
>>this way against Stefan, just because his program has a bug." So he had simply
>>executed the move on the board, entered Shredder's reply and continued with
>>the game."
>>
>>So basicly "Jonny" (the engine) saw Shredder had bugged out and instantly
>>punished it by going for the repetition.
>
>Your version of the facts is wrong on several accounts:
>
>1) The bug was not in the Shredder interface or if it was, that wasn't
>critical since it's the engine that repeated the position, not the interface.
>
>2) The engine Jonny had not claimed a draw (it didn't know about 3 fold
>repetition), only the ChessBase GUI that Mr. Zwanzger was using informed
>that the position was repeated 3 times.
>

I don't understand all this engine/interfacedifferentiation. It is one chess
playing unit, and does not matter whether it is built of only an engine, engine
+ interface, or an interface with a built-in engine...

There is no border line between an engine and an interface. For example, in
WinBoard the engine is solely responsible for the draw claim, but in the UCI
protocol the interface is mainly responsible for claiming the draw. And even
though I believe that most UCI users will start printing draw claim info strings
from the next WCCC (I have already added this), I don't think anyone did that in
Graz.

So, the discussion should be focused on whether the operator can overrule his
program. The engine/interface discussion doesn't make much sense here.


>--
>GCP



This page took 0.02 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.