Author: Eduard Nemeth
Date: 00:47:02 05/16/05
Eine Engine, die beim Blitzen mit einer Bewertung von +13.56 für sich, ins Remis
(50 Züge Regel) rennt.
Wie geht das denn? So:
[Event "5m + 0s, rated blitz"]
[Site "playchess.com"]
[Date "2005.??.??"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Fou Blanc, Patriot 2.0"]
[Black "Father"]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]
[ECO "A84"]
[WhiteElo "2505"]
[BlackElo "2245"]
[PlyCount "392"]
[EventDate "2005.??.??"]
1. d4 {0} d5 {1} 2. c4 {0} e6 {1} 3. Nc3 {0} f5 {2} 4. Nf3 {0} c6 {1} 5. e3 {0}
Nf6 {1} 6. Bd3 {0} Bd6 {1} 7. O-O {0} O-O {1} 8. b3 {0} Re8 {4} 9. Bb2 {
0.48/14 14} g6 {2} 10. c5 {1.08/13 20} Bf8 {2} 11. Ne5 {1.38/13 13} Bg7 {3} 12.
f4 {1.17/14 11} Nbd7 {1} 13. Qc2 {1.17/14 13} Nf8 {1} 14. a4 {1.47/13 9} Qe7 {
15} 15. a5 {1.35/14 8} a6 {1} 16. Nf3 {1.47/13 9} Ra7 {2} 17. Nd2 {1.53/13 8}
Bd7 {11} 18. Be2 {1.62/14 14} Rea8 {2} 19. h3 {1.71/14 12} Be8 {2} 20. Ra4 {
1.44/14 10} Rc8 {1} 21. Nf3 {1.29/13 6} Rc7 {1} 22. Ng5 {1.56/13 6} Ra8 {3} 23.
Qd2 {1.56/13 7} Rac8 {1} 24. Qe1 {1.56/13 6} N6d7 {1} 25. Qg3 {1.98/13 5} Nb8 {
13} 26. Re1 {2.10/13 7} Qd8 {1} 27. Bd3 {2.19/13 7} Re7 {4} 28. Rea1 {2.31/12 5
} Qc7 {1} 29. Nf3 {2.16/12 4} Nbd7 {1} 30. Qh4 {1.80/13 3} Bf6 {5} 31. Ng5 {
2.07/12 4} Rg7 {4} 32. Qh6 {2.04/12 5} Bd8 {1} 33. Be2 {1.74/12 8} Nb8 {1} 34.
Qh4 {2.10/12 3} Bxg5 {3} 35. Qxg5 {2.64/14 3} Qe7 {1} 36. Qg3 {2.46/14 3} Rc7 {
1} 37. Re1 {2.25/13 4} Qd8 {2} 38. Rb4 {2.49/13 3} Rce7 {1} 39. Bd3 {2.97/13 4}
Qc7 {1} 40. Qh4 {2.97/12 3} Nbd7 {1} 41. Bc2 {2.52/12 3} Nb8 {1} 42. Ra4 {
2.82/13 3} Ref7 {1} 43. Ne2 {2.37/13 4} Qe7 {1} 44. Qf2 {2.40/15 4} Nbd7 {1}
45. Bc3 {2.28/14 2} Nf6 {1} 46. Ng3 {2.04/13 2} Kh8 {1} 47. Bd1 {1.74/13 4} Kg8
{1} 48. Be2 {2.10/13 1} Qd8 {1} 49. Ra2 {2.04/13 3} Kh8 {1} 50. Qf3 {2.04/12 1}
Kg8 {1} 51. Rc1 {2.04/13 2} Kh8 {1} 52. Rd1 {2.01/12 0} Kg8 {1} 53. Qf2 {
2.01/13 3} Kh8 {1} 54. Bd2 {1.98/12 0} Kg8 {0} 55. b4 {2.04/13 1} Kh8 {1} 56.
Rc1 {1.98/12 0} Kg8 {0} 57. Bc3 {1.98/13 2} Kh8 {4} 58. Qe1 {1.89/13 0} Kg8 {1}
59. Qd1 {2.01/13 2} Kh8 {0} 60. Qa4 {1.98/12 0} Kg8 {1} 61. Qb3 {2.10/12 2} Qc7
{0} 62. Rf1 {2.04/11 1} Kh8 {0} 63. Qd1 {1.92/11 0} Kg8 {0} 64. Bd3 {1.98/12 1}
Kh8 {1} 65. Raf2 {1.89/12 1} Kg8 {0} 66. Bb2 {1.98/11 1} Kh8 {0} 67. Re1 {
1.80/12 0} Kg8 {0} 68. Qb3 {2.01/12 2} N6d7 {0} 69. Bc3 {2.37/11 1} Nb8 {1} 70.
Nf1 {2.91/12 1} Re7 {0} 71. Nd2 {2.43/12 1} Kh8 {0} 72. Nf3 {2.22/12 0} Kg8 {0}
73. Nh4 {2.70/10 1} Kh8 {1} 74. Rd1 {2.04/13 2} Kg8 {0} 75. Nf3 {2.67/10 1} Kh8
{0} 76. Ra2 {2.25/11 1} Kg8 {0} 77. Qc2 {3.15/10 1} Kh8 {0} 78. Be1 {3.33/12 1}
Kg8 {0} 79. Bh4 {4.53/12 0} Qd7 {0} 80. Rc1 {5.28/10 1} Qc7 {3} 81. Qf2 {
4.92/14 0} Qd7 {9} 82. Bf6 {5.76/10 0} Qc7 {1} 83. Qh4 {5.40/11 1} Qd7 {9} 84.
Ne5 {5.85/10 0} Qc7 {1} 85. Rd1 {6.06/11 0} Rd7 {7} 86. Nxd7 {6.57/11 0} Qxd7 {
2} 87. Be5 {7.80/12 1} Qe7 {16} 88. Qxe7 {10.08/11 0} Rxe7 {1} 89. Bxb8 {
9.51/16 0} Kf7 {1} 90. Bd6 {10.20/11 0} Rd7 {1} 91. g4 {9.93/14 0} Kg7 {1} 92.
Kf2 {10.32/10 1} Kf7 {2} 93. Kf3 {10.23/11 0} Rd8 {1} 94. g5 {9.93/13 0} Rd7 {0
} 95. h4 {10.56/12 0} Kg8 {2} 96. Rc1 {10.23/10 0} Rf7 {1} 97. Rg2 {10.38/11 0}
Rd7 {0} 98. Be5 {10.38/10 0} Rd8 {1} 99. Bc7 {9.93/11 0} Rd7 {1} 100. Bb6 {
10.38/12 0} Rf7 {1} 101. Bd8 {10.20/14 0} Rd7 {0} 102. Bf6 {9.84/16 0} Rf7 {1}
103. Be5 {10.08/12 0} Rd7 {0} 104. Ra1 {10.38/12 0} Rd8 {0} 105. Bc7 {9.93/11 0
} Rd7 {1} 106. Bb6 {10.32/12 0} Rf7 {1} 107. Raa2 {10.20/14 0} Rd7 {0} 108. Rg1
{10.32/11 0} Re7 {' 16} 109. Bd8 {10.29/12 0} Rd7 {0} 110. Bf6 {10.74/8 0} Rf7
{1} 111. Be5 {10.38/11 0} Rd7 {0} 112. Rb1 {10.44/10 0} Rd8 {0} 113. Bd6 {
9.93/10 0} Rd7 {1} 114. Rg2 {10.44/9 0} Rd8 {0} 115. Ke2 {9.87/14 0} Rd7 {0}
116. Ra1 {10.44/9 0} Rd8 {1} 117. Kd2 {9.90/10 0} Rc8 {1} 118. Kc2 {9.90/9 0}
Ra8 {1} 119. Kb2 {10.20/9 0} Rc8 {0} 120. Kb3 {9.90/8 0} Ra8 {0} 121. Kc2 {
9.93/8 0} Rc8 {0} 122. Kc3 {9.90/9 0} Ra8 {0} 123. Rf2 {9.93/8 0} Rc8 {0} 124.
Rg1 {9.90/9 0} Ra8 {0} 125. Rb2 {9.93/8 0} Rc8 {0} 126. Be5 {10.98/3 0} Ra8 {0}
127. Ra2 {11.07/3 0} Rc8 {0} 128. Rf2 {11.01/3 0} Ra8 {0} 129. Ra1 {11.04/3 0}
Rc8 {0} 130. Rg2 {11.01/3 0} Ra8 {0} 131. Rd1 {11.01/3 0} Rc8 {0} 132. Re1 {
10.98/3 0} Ra8 {0} 133. Ra1 {11.07/3 0} Rc8 {0} 134. Rd1 {10.98/3 0} Ra8 {0}
135. Re1 {11.01/3 0} Rc8 {0} 136. Rc1 {10.98/3 0} Ra8 {0} 137. Kb3 {11.07/3 0}
Rc8 {0} 138. Ra2 {11.01/3 0} Ra8 {0} 139. Rf2 {11.04/3 0} Rc8 {0} 140. Rg2 {
11.01/3 0} Nd7 {1} 141. Bd6 {9.75/16 0} Nf8 {2} 142. Ra2 {10.86/3 0} Nd7 {1}
143. Rh2 {9.48/11 0} Rb8 {1} 144. Bxb8 {12.84/3 0} Nxb8 {0} 145. h5 {12.60/15 0
} Bf7 {1} 146. hxg6 {13.17/3 0} Bxg6 {1} 147. Rg1 {13.71/3 0} Kg7 {1} 148. Kc3
{13.59/3 0} Nd7 {0} 149. Rgh1 {12.81/16 0} Nf8 {0} 150. Rf2 {12.81/15 0} Kg8 {0
} 151. Rg2 {13.65/3 0} Kg7 {0} 152. Ra2 {13.41/3 0} Kg8 {0} 153. Rf2 {13.62/3 0
} Kg7 {0} 154. Rg2 {13.44/3 0} Kg8 {0} 155. Ra2 {13.62/3 0} Kg7 {0} 156. Rb2 {
13.38/3 0} Kg8 {0} 157. Rd2 {13.56/3 0} Kg7 {0} 158. Kb3 {13.29/3 0} Kg8 {0}
159. Rg2 {13.56/3 0} Kg7 {0} 160. Ra2 {13.35/3 0} Kg8 {0} 161. Rf2 {13.53/3 0}
Kg7 {0} 162. Rg2 {13.35/3 0} Kg8 {0} 163. Ra2 {13.56/3 0} Kf7 {0} 164. Kc3 {
13.50/3 0} Ke8 {0} 165. Rg2 {13.56/3 0} Kd7 {0} 166. Ra2 {13.32/3 0} Kc8 {0}
167. Rg2 {13.56/3 0} Kb8 {0} 168. Ra2 {13.62/3 0} Ka7 {0} 169. Rg2 {13.71/3 0}
Ka8 {0} 170. Ra2 {13.92/3 0} Kb8 {0} 171. Rg2 {13.65/3 0} Kc8 {0} 172. Ra2 {
13.56/3 0} Kd8 {0} 173. Rg2 {13.47/3 0} Ke7 {0} 174. Ra2 {13.26/3 0} Kf7 {0}
175. Rg2 {13.50/3 0} Kg7 {0} 176. Rd2 {13.35/3 0} Kg8 {0} 177. Rb2 {13.59/3 0}
Kg7 {0} 178. Kb3 {13.26/3 0} Kg8 {0} 179. Rd2 {13.50/3 0} Kg7 {0} 180. Rf2 {
13.32/3 0} Kg8 {0} 181. Rb2 {13.47/3 0} Kg7 {0} 182. Rc2 {13.23/3 0} Kg8 {0}
183. Kc3 {13.41/3 0} Kg7 {0} 184. Rch2 {13.23/3 0} Kg8 {0} 185. Rg1 {13.65/3 0}
Kg7 {0} 186. Ra1 {13.41/3 0} Kg8 {0} 187. Rd1 {13.56/3 0} Kg7 {0} 188. Rg1 {
13.44/3 0} Kg8 {0} 189. Ra1 {13.62/3 0} Kg7 {0} 190. Rd1 {13.35/3 0} Kg8 {0}
191. Re1 {13.56/3 0} Kg7 {1} 192. Rc1 {13.35/3 0} Kf7 {0} 193. Rg1 {13.50/3 0}
Ke8 {0} 194. Ra1 {13.53/3 0} Kd7 {0} 195. Rg1 {13.32/3 0} Kc8 {0} 196. Ra1 {
13.56/3 0} Kb8 {(Lag: Av=0.71s, max=2.2s) 0} 1/2-1/2
Viel interessanter als die Partie, sind jedoch meine Beobachtungen in der
Analyse. Ist Patriot 2.0 wirklich ein Clone von Fruit (Toga II basiert ebenfalls
auf Fruit 2.0)?
Da ich auf folgender Seite nämlich las, dass Patriot 2.0 (noch Beta)
wahrscheinlich ein Clone von Fruit sein konnte (Die Bewertungen von Toga II und
Fruit 2.0 sollen dieselben sein, nur dass Toga II gegenüber Fruit II etwas
verbessert sein soll)
http://www.uciengines.de/UCI-Engines/Patriot/Patriot2/patriot2.html
nahm ich zur Analyse auch die Engine Toga II 0.93, mit 64 MB Hash, und pickte an
einigen Stellen ganz wahllos, indem ich die Partie durchklickte, einige Analysen
heraus. Dabei ist das herausgekommen:
Fou Blanc,Patriot 2.0 - Father, 5m + 0s, rated blitz 2005
5nk1/1p5p/p1p1p1b1/P1Pp1pP1/1P1P1P2/2KBP3/1R6/7R w - - 0 1
Analysis by Toga II 0.93:
157.b5 axb5
+- (7.80) Tiefe: 1/2 00:00:00
157.Ta1
+- (8.97) Tiefe: 1/2 00:00:00
157.Td2
+- (9.05) Tiefe: 1/2 00:00:00
157.Td2 Sd7
+- (8.69) Tiefe: 2/3 00:00:00
157.Td2 Sd7 158.Tg2
+- (8.74) Tiefe: 3/4 00:00:00
157.Td2 Kf7 158.Kb3 Sd7
+- (8.54) Tiefe: 4/5 00:00:00
Bei der obigen Analyse, entspricht die Bewertung von Toga II in Tiefe 1, fast
der Bewertung von Patriot 2.0, multipliziert man sie mit 1.5:
9.05 x 1.5 = 13.575. Das ist fast identisch mit Tiefe 3 im selben Zug mit
Patriot 2.0:
157. Rd2 {13.56/3 0}.
Im folgendem Test (Zug 185) verhält es sich sogar ganz exakt:
Fou Blanc,Patriot 2.0 - Father, 5m + 0s, rated blitz 2005
5nk1/1p5p/p1p1p1b1/P1Pp1pP1/1P1P1P2/2KBP3/7R/7R w - - 0 1
Analysis by Toga II 0.93:
185.Le2
+- (8.76) Tiefe: 1/1 00:00:00
185.Ta1
+- (9.09) Tiefe: 1/1 00:00:00
185.Tg1
+- (9.10) Tiefe: 1/1 00:00:00
185.Tg1 Sd7
+- (8.74) Tiefe: 2/3 00:00:00
185.Tg1 Sd7 186.Ta1
+- (8.73) Tiefe: 3/4 00:00:00
185.Ta1 Sd7 186.Tg1
+- (8.74) Tiefe: 3/4 00:00:00
185.Ta1 Kf7 186.Tg1 Sd7
+- (8.64) Tiefe: 4/5 00:00:00
9.10 x 1.5 = 13.65. In der Partie bewertet Patriot 2.0 in Tiefe 3 exakt
dasselbe:
Patriot 2.0: 185. Rg1 {13.65/3 0}
Weitere Kostproben? Eine noch:
Fou Blanc,Patriot 2.0 - Father, Blitz:3' Playchess.com
[D]2k2n2/1p5p/p1p1p1b1/P1Pp1pP1/1P1P1P2/2KBP3/7R/6R1 w - - 0 1
b5! wins, but...
Analysis by Toga II 0.93 (64 MB Hash):
196.Kc2
+- (8.82) Tiefe: 1/1 00:00:00
196.Ta1
+- (9.04) Tiefe: 1/1 00:00:00
196.Ta1 Kc7
= (0.00) Tiefe: 2/4 00:00:00
196.b5 axb5
+- (7.71) Tiefe: 2/4 00:00:00
196.b5 axb5 197.Kb4
+- (7.73) Tiefe: 3/6 00:00:00
196.b5 axb5 197.Kb4 Sd7
+- (7.36) Tiefe: 4/6 00:00:00
196.b5 axb5 197.Tgh1 Sd7 198.Tb2
+- (7.38) Tiefe: 5/7 00:00:00
---> 9.04 x 1.5 = 13.56.
13.56 ist aber exakt die Bewertung von Patriot 2.0 in der Partie und Zug 196:
Patriot 2.0:---> 196. Ra1 {13.56/3 0}.
Die Tiefe 1 bei Toga II, entspricht angeblich (die Betonung liegt auf
angeblich!) laut Tests, unter Patriot 2.0 also einer Tiefe von 3, und der Score
soll 1.5x dem von Toga II entsprechen.
Wir sehen hier also dass Patriot, vermutlich aus arger Zeitnot heraus, schon in
Tiefe 3 (also quasi sofort) zog, und die Bewertung ist tatsächlich oben 13.56!
Der Gewinnzug wäre b5! gewesen. Denn aber konnte Patriot 2.0 vermutlich nicht
ausspielen, weil er keine Zeit mehr hatte, und daher quasi sofort zog (in 0.00
Sekunden) !
Ist das nicht kurios: Eine Engine bewertet +13.56 für sich, die Partie jedoch
endet Remis?
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.