Author: Kurt Utzinger
Date: 23:30:27 03/05/06
Go up one level in this thread
On March 06, 2006 at 02:17:43, Jouni Uski wrote:
>I read here, that You don't have Fritz 9! Why? I think it still is the
>best program for long analysis. E.g. Rybka beta is far behind and even
>Hiarcs 10 is not quite as good. So what's your reason? Is it the short
>main line may be? I am just curious. What is the best engine then for long
>analysis?
>
>Jouni
There is no need to have all engines. Much more important
is how to use computer programs most efficiently for analysis
purposes ... and here, it's wrong or at least not successful
to start engine X and waiting some hours for good moves. Uri
is a strong correspondence player who knows how to work with
computer programs and he perhaps can easily do without Fritz 9.
And furthermore: short main line is no disadvantage because
you can't trust what engines show after the third half move.
Best regards
Kurt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.