Author: Uri Blass
Date: 04:09:18 03/06/06
Go up one level in this thread
On March 06, 2006 at 02:30:27, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >On March 06, 2006 at 02:17:43, Jouni Uski wrote: > >>I read here, that You don't have Fritz 9! Why? I think it still is the >>best program for long analysis. E.g. Rybka beta is far behind and even >>Hiarcs 10 is not quite as good. So what's your reason? Is it the short >>main line may be? I am just curious. What is the best engine then for long >>analysis? >> >>Jouni > > There is no need to have all engines. Much more important > is how to use computer programs most efficiently for analysis > purposes ... and here, it's wrong or at least not successful > to start engine X and waiting some hours for good moves. Uri > is a strong correspondence player who knows how to work with > computer programs and he perhaps can easily do without Fritz 9. > And furthermore: short main line is no disadvantage because > you can't trust what engines show after the third half move. > Best regards > Kurt I partly disagree. More engines of course can be an advantage and also long analysis can be an advantage but I believe that fritz9 is not the best engine for analysis and I do not need all engines. I think fruit is not worse than fritz9 for analysis. I also think that not having long line is not a big disadvantage(but it is a disadvantage). I do not use engines only for long analysis but most of the computer time that I use is long analysis. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.