Author: Prakash Das
Date: 15:49:43 12/13/98
Go up one level in this thread
On December 12, 1998 at 16:17:12, SEAN EVANS wrote: > >Interesting Prakash Das.... so you are going to monitor and read every single >post at rgcc and CCC which is the only way you will know what is happening >there... please forgive my sarcasm but I am being *bluntly* honest as your point >makes absolutely no sense.... I did not say or imply this. Obviously I will not be moderating rgcc or anything else.. I implied any related problems from CCC which spilled over and if they were brought to my attention that as a result made the life of a CCC member here so difficult he could not participate in these boards. Another example would be where as a result a post here, that member was harrassed repeatedly in email, and as a result he/she complained to me. Obviously the moderator (in my view) has to do something about this. So, while a moderator would ideally like only to focus on CCC and nothing else, in practice this will not be so, and there will always be exceptional cases. A moderator by necessity has to keep all options open, and not be forced to admit to some narrow viewpoints. At least that's how I feel. >>I believe a moderator should be understanding and not a hot head. > >Interesting..... how about fair and objective ?! How does saying being understanding and not a hot head rule out objectivism and fairness? Making baseless and provocative assumptions and reasoning is not an intelligent way to communicate. > >I say this with a smile... Well, then please do not smile while making ludicrous statements.
This page took 0.02 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.