Author: Uri Blass
Date: 10:24:54 02/15/04
I understood from the winboard forum that Bob considers DanChess as a crafty clone and the question is what is the definition of a clone. I remember from slater's post in this forum that if most of the code is different you cannot win in court by complaining that it is a clone. I understood from Dann's post that only 30% of the code of DanChess is similiar(that does not mean the same as Crafty). Dann Corbit posted in the winboard forum the SEE function of Danchess that is similiar to Crafty. I wonder if it is really the main reason that Bob considers Danchess as a clone or only one of the reasons. Uri
This page took 0.03 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.