Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Computer chess and processor speed in 20 years from now...

Author: Chris

Date: 03:15:04 02/26/03

I am doing some research on computer chess, and I am looking for some
essays/viewpoints about the future, say 20-30 years from now. The important
thing is the big questions like: What will it mean for chess when/if a computer
program beats the human world champion consistently in a match (not only near
equal scores)? If computers reach 3100-3300 ELO or so, will it change anything
in comparison with the situation at present? Will it spoil chess? Is there a
chance/risk of chess being solved with the supercomputers of the future? etc.

I am also looking for some predictions/information about processor speed in
20-30 years from now.

Any viewpoints from the forum on these questions are of course most welcome, and
links to essays/viewpoints on this subject would be of great help.

Thanks in advance for any help

Re: Computer chess 10 years Chris Carson 10:37:43 02/26/03
- Re: Computer chess 10 years Aaron Gordon 14:31:45 02/26/03
  - Re: Computer chess 10 years Chris Carson 15:27:13 02/26/03
- Re: Computer chess 10 years (cleaned up chart) Chris Carson 10:38:58 02/26/03
Re: Computer chess and processor speed in 20 years from now... Chris Carson 05:08:17 02/26/03
- Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Steve J 09:03:42 02/26/03
  - Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Dave Gomboc 02:41:04 03/01/03
    - Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Mogens Larsen 04:22:59 03/02/03
  - Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Dann Corbit 15:58:09 02/28/03
    - Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Jeremiah Penery 17:48:38 02/28/03
    - Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Tom Kerrigan 16:06:01 02/28/03
  - Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Robert Hyatt 10:31:54 02/27/03
    - Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Tom Kerrigan 16:03:54 02/28/03
    - Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Jeremiah Penery 13:51:44 02/27/03
      - Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Matt Taylor 08:46:24 02/28/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Jeremiah Penery 14:52:48 02/28/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Matt Taylor 23:29:47 02/28/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Jeremiah Penery 23:38:28 02/28/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Matt Taylor 23:44:08 02/28/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Jeremiah Penery 00:11:43 03/01/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Matt Taylor 06:08:25 03/01/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Robert Hyatt 21:20:22 02/28/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Jeremiah Penery 22:57:32 02/28/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Robert Hyatt 17:00:21 03/01/03
      - Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Robert Hyatt 15:09:47 02/27/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Tom Kerrigan 15:13:30 02/28/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Robert Hyatt 20:35:54 02/28/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Jeremiah Penery 16:16:41 02/27/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Steve J 17:45:54 02/27/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Robert Hyatt 19:45:31 02/27/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Jeremiah Penery 22:36:00 02/27/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Robert Hyatt 08:45:18 02/28/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Tom Kerrigan 15:36:32 02/28/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Robert Hyatt 20:38:21 02/28/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Jeremiah Penery 14:28:23 02/28/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Robert Hyatt 15:11:36 02/28/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Sune Fischer 02:09:48 03/02/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Jeremiah Penery 17:41:59 02/28/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Robert Hyatt 21:07:01 02/28/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Matt Taylor 06:56:59 03/01/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Robert Hyatt 07:55:32 03/01/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Matt Taylor 11:26:03 03/01/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Robert Hyatt 17:10:49 03/01/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Matt Taylor 21:33:11 03/01/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Robert Hyatt 07:17:08 03/02/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Jeremiah Penery 19:42:59 03/02/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Robert Hyatt 20:24:16 03/02/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Jeremiah Penery 19:33:57 03/03/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Robert Hyatt 21:24:27 03/03/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Jeremiah Penery 19:06:53 03/04/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Robert Hyatt 20:09:14 03/04/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Jeremiah Penery 22:23:51 03/04/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Robert Hyatt 08:41:13 03/05/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Matt Taylor 14:28:18 03/07/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Matt Taylor 10:03:23 03/04/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Robert Hyatt 11:40:53 03/04/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Matt Taylor 14:23:26 03/07/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Robert Hyatt 20:46:51 03/07/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Jeremiah Penery 22:53:11 02/28/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Robert Hyatt 07:11:13 03/01/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Jeremiah Penery 08:48:50 03/01/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Robert Hyatt 17:17:14 03/01/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Jeremiah Penery 23:39:08 03/01/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Robert Hyatt 07:22:07 03/02/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Jeremiah Penery 19:29:27 03/02/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Robert Hyatt 20:32:27 03/02/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Jeremiah Penery 19:27:37 03/03/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Robert Hyatt 21:15:53 03/03/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Jeremiah Penery 18:57:19 03/04/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Robert Hyatt 20:10:38 03/04/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Matt Taylor 06:46:19 03/01/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Jeremiah Penery 07:06:43 03/01/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Robert Hyatt 07:39:31 03/01/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Jeremiah Penery 08:58:14 03/01/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Robert Hyatt 17:23:24 03/01/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Jeremiah Penery 23:02:39 03/01/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Robert Hyatt 07:34:23 03/02/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Jeremiah Penery 19:18:35 03/02/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Robert Hyatt 20:43:41 03/02/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Jeremiah Penery 19:05:39 03/03/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Robert Hyatt 08:23:17 03/04/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Jeremiah Penery 18:55:55 03/04/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Robert Hyatt 19:56:50 03/05/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Matt Taylor 14:03:32 03/07/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Jeremiah Penery 15:05:34 03/06/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Andrew Dados 05:14:00 03/06/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Keith Evans 11:03:45 03/06/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Robert Hyatt 08:40:16 03/06/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Matt Taylor 14:42:42 03/07/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Robert Hyatt 20:37:24 03/07/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Matt Taylor 21:42:23 03/07/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Robert Hyatt 22:37:18 03/07/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Jeremiah Penery 11:52:02 03/08/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Robert Hyatt 20:58:37 03/08/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Jeremiah Penery 22:26:33 03/08/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Robert Hyatt 19:10:06 03/09/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Jeremiah Penery 16:56:12 03/10/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Robert Hyatt 09:22:09 03/11/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Matt Taylor 19:03:59 03/11/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Jeremiah Penery 17:17:57 03/11/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Robert Hyatt 20:29:48 03/11/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Jeremiah Penery 16:20:40 03/12/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Robert Hyatt 19:50:07 03/12/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Jeremiah Penery 13:33:42 03/13/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Robert Hyatt 21:16:47 03/13/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Jeremiah Penery 15:48:18 03/14/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Robert Hyatt 20:47:40 03/14/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Steve J 05:12:01 03/11/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Andrew Dados 15:09:45 03/06/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Matt Taylor 10:33:50 03/04/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Robert Hyatt 11:58:21 03/04/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Matt Taylor 16:22:50 03/04/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Robert Hyatt 20:06:39 03/04/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Jeremiah Penery 22:19:12 03/04/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Robert Hyatt 08:45:20 03/05/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Daniel Clausen 06:37:36 03/06/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Robert Hyatt 08:20:18 03/06/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Jeremiah Penery 14:38:23 03/05/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Robert Hyatt 15:26:10 03/05/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Jeremiah Penery 19:38:44 03/05/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Robert Hyatt 08:48:47 03/06/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Jeremiah Penery 14:47:45 03/06/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Robert Hyatt 15:23:59 03/06/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Keith Evans 07:34:16 03/07/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Robert Hyatt 20:39:06 03/07/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Matt Taylor 23:09:52 03/02/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Robert Hyatt 06:50:12 03/03/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Matt Taylor 13:44:12 03/03/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Robert Hyatt 14:10:55 03/03/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Matt Taylor 21:57:18 03/01/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Robert Hyatt 07:28:02 03/02/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Matt Taylor 13:33:07 03/03/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Robert Hyatt 14:25:18 03/03/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Matt Taylor 16:59:47 03/03/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Robert Hyatt 17:21:47 03/03/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Matt Taylor 21:09:19 03/03/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Robert Hyatt 21:39:55 03/03/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Matt Taylor 10:38:53 03/04/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Robert Hyatt 12:17:12 03/04/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Tom Kerrigan 15:18:08 02/28/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Robert Hyatt 20:42:53 02/28/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Steve J 22:25:20 02/27/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Robert Hyatt 08:49:45 02/28/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Jeremiah Penery 18:30:09 02/27/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Robert Hyatt 19:47:20 02/27/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Steve J 22:40:23 02/27/03
        
        Wonderful . . . screwed up line lengths (NO TEXT) Jeremiah Penery 16:18:59 02/27/03
        
        Re: Wonderful . . . screwed up line lengths (NO TEXT) Robert Hyatt 19:49:58 02/27/03
        
        Re: Wonderful . . . screwed up line lengths (NO TEXT) Daniel Clausen 00:23:52 02/28/03
        
        Re: Wonderful . . . screwed up line lengths (NO TEXT) Robert Hyatt 08:52:09 02/28/03
        
        Re: Wonderful . . . screwed up line lengths (NO TEXT) Jeremiah Penery 21:31:59 02/27/03
        
        Re: Wonderful . . . screwed up line lengths (NO TEXT) Robert Hyatt 09:07:43 02/28/03
    - Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Brian Richardson 12:57:04 02/27/03
      - Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Robert Hyatt 13:43:45 02/27/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" It is well outpaced the last years! Torstein Hall 16:30:21 02/28/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" It is well outpaced the last years! Robert Hyatt 21:13:05 02/28/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" It is well outpaced the last years! Matt Taylor 20:46:41 02/28/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" It is well outpaced the last years! Robert Hyatt 21:16:36 02/28/03
  - Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Daniel Clausen 09:12:42 02/26/03
- Re: Computer chess and processor speed in 20 years from now... Chris Carson 05:12:56 02/26/03
Re: Computer chess and processor speed in 20 years from now... GuyHaworth 05:06:04 02/26/03

This page took 0.06 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.